Campaign Correspondence

In the spirit of our commitment to public, transparent advocacy, this page serves as an official log of all correspondence between the #FreeDotYE campaign and internet governance bodies like ICANN and IANA.

Submitted: October 2, 2025

From: FreeTheDotYE Campaign

To: Yemeni Ministry of Telecommunications & Information Technology

Thread: Message 5 in conversation

Reply to: IANA Responds to Rebuttal, Formally Requests Evidence

View Full Correspondence

Subject: An Urgent Request for Official Support Regarding the Redelegation of Yemen’s National Domain (.YE) / طلب دعم رسمي عاجل بخصوص استعادة النطاق الوطني لليمن (.YE) من سيطرة المليشيا

To: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]


إلى قيادة وزارة الاتصالات وتقنية المعلومات الموقرة،

تحية طيبة وبعد،

الموضوع: طلب دعم رسمي من وزارة الاتصالات لتوثيق ملف إعادة تفويض النطاق الوطني (.YE) لدى منظمة ICANN/IANA

نكتب إليكم اليوم بصفتنا حملة FreeTheDotYE، وهي مبادرة تطوعية مستقلة تهدف إلى استعادة سيادة اليمن الرقمية عبر تحرير النطاق الوطني (.YE) من سيطرة المليشيا الحوثية منذ 2014.

لقد تقدّمنا رسميًا بطلب إعادة تفويض إلى منظمة ICANN والذراع التشغيلي لها (IANA)، استنادًا إلى مبادئ RFC 1591 و“إطار التفسير“ المعتمد من ccNSO، والتي تشترط أن يخدم مشغل النطاق المجتمع بأكمله بعدالة وحياد.

أدلة على فشل المشغل الحالي (تيليمن – صنعاء) تشمل:

1- الإقصاء المؤسسي: إجبار الحكومة الشرعية ومؤسساتها على استخدام نطاقات بديلة (.org، .com) بدلًا من النطاق الرسمي (.gov.ye).

2- تسليح البنية الرقمية: استغلال النطاق الوطني في التهديدات العسكرية (hocc.gov.ye) وإنشاء منصات للتصيد (twitter.com.ye).

3- تهديد الأمن والاستقرار: سوء إدارة النطاق بما يضر باستقرار وأمن الإنترنت محليًا ودوليًا.

التطور الأخير والمهم:

في ردها بتاريخ 30 سبتمبر 2025، طلبت IANA تزويدها بوثائق دعم شاملة لإثبات وجود “دعم مجتمعي واسع”. وتُعتبر وزارتكم بصفتها الجهة الشرعية والسيادية الممثلة للمجتمع اليمني في قطاع الاتصالات، الطرف الأكثر أهمية ضمن ما يسميه الإطار التفسيري بـ “الأطراف ذات المصلحة الجوهرية” (Significantly Interested Parties).

المطلوب:

نلتمس من وزارتكم الكريمة إصدار خطاب دعم رسمي يؤيد إعادة تفويض النطاق الوطني (.YE) ووضعه تحت وصاية محايدة ومؤقتة لحين استقرار الأوضاع. إن مثل هذا الخطاب سيشكل عنصرًا محوريًا في استكمال الملف أمام ICANN/IANA.

نحن على استعداد لتزويد وزارتكم بكامل ملف الأدلة، بما في ذلك المراسلات الرسمية مع IANA، والتعاون معكم بشكل كامل في هذا الملف. كما نود إحاطتكم بأن جميع أنشطتنا وبياناتنا منشورة عبر موقعنا freethedotye.org ، حيث نحرص على نشر المراسلات والوثائق ذات الصلة بكل شفافية، تعزيزًا لمبادئ النزاهة والمساءلة العامة. وتجدر الإشارة إلى أن هذه المراسلة تندرج ضمن المراسلات المنشورة في الموقع ضمن قسم المراسلات الرسمية.

إن استعادة نطاق .YE ليس مجرد قضية تقنية، بل هو جزء لا يتجزأ من معركة استعادة الدولة ومؤسساتها. موقفكم الرسمي اليوم هو خطوة حاسمة في هذه المعركة.

وتقبلوا فائق الاحترام والتقدير.

مع خالص التحية،

فريق حملة FreeTheDotYE

الموقع الإلكتروني: freethedotye.org

للتواصل:[email protected]

https://x.com/FreeTheDotYE

Submitted: September 30, 2025

From: Selina Harrington, IANA Operations Manager

To: FreeTheDotYE Campaign

Thread: Message 4 in conversation

Reply to: Our Response and Request for Next Steps

View Full Correspondence

Subject: [IANA #1429149] Request for Review and Redelegation of the .YE ccTLD due to Governance Failure and Lack of Community Representation

Dear requester,

Thank you for your response. In order to consider the applicability of a “Revocation followed by Delegation” path or to determine whether the threshold of “substantial misbehavior” has been met, any assessment would require the submission of comprehensive supporting documentation. Please provide the supporting materials you referenced as attachments (e.g. as PDF files) in your response.

We would be happy to arrange a call to clarify the materials required for a formal submission. Please propose a few suitable times, and we will do our best to accommodate.

As for timing, if we receive a formal change request, we will process it in line with the established service level agreements that govern the IANA Naming functions. You have cited the ICANN Correspondence process, but please note that evaluations associated with the management of ccTLDs are a confidential process and correspondence is not posted in this manner.

You also cited the case of a transfer of the .SO domain in 2009. We note that this may be of limited applicability in your case as the governing policies have changed since that time, and the pertinent facts in that case are likely different.

If you have any additional questions, please let us know.

Kind regards,

Selina Harrington IANA Operations Manager

Submitted: September 24, 2025

From: FreeTheDotYE Campaign

To: Selina Harrington, IANA Operations Manager

Thread: Message 3 in conversation

Reply to: Response from IANA on the .YE ccTLD

View Full Correspondence

Subject: Re: [IANA #1429149] .YE ccTLD - Clarification on Substantial Misbehaviour and Next Steps

Dear Ms. Harrington,

Thank you for your response. We appreciate the clarification regarding ICP-1 and will align our submissions with the ccNSO Framework of Interpretation (FOI) going forward.

We respectfully submit that the .YE situation meets the FOI’s threshold for “substantial misbehaviour,” warranting initiation of a formal review:

  1. Security & stability risk (FOI 4.4–4.6). The FOI treats substantial misbehaviour as conduct that imposes serious harm or a “substantial adverse impact on the Internet community” by posing a threat to the stability and security of the DNS. The use of .gov.ye for hostile communications (e.g., hocc.gov.ye) and the configuration of phishing infrastructure (e.g., twitter.com.ye) create ongoing security risks and erosion of trust, precisely the harms contemplated in FOI 4.4–4.6.
  2. Local resolution is not viable where the operator is inseparable from an armed group repressing the community. While matters of equity/justice are ordinarily local, the FOI recognizes an exception where security/stability is compromised, which applies here.

Terminology. Consistent with the FOI, we use “Transfer” for a consented change of manager and “Revocation followed by Delegation” where consent is absent.

Process & continuity (FOI 4.7–4.9). Revocation is a last resort after notice and opportunity to cure. If pursued, the IANA Operator should work with significantly interested parties to maintain continuity of resolution until a suitable replacement can assume responsibility. A neutral, time-limited trusteeship would operationalize that continuity and enable a legitimate, community-led process to identify a permanent local operator.

Precedent. IANA and the ICANN Board have acted in conflict-affected contexts (e.g., .SO in 2009), documenting rationale and safeguards. We believe .YE merits a similarly careful, transparent process.

Requests
• Please confirm the applicable path (Revocation followed by Delegation) and the documentation you require from significantly interested parties for a temporary neutral trusteeship.
• To ensure our formal application is fully compliant, we request a brief procedural call with PTI/IANA Root Zone Management ([email protected]) to clarify required materials, evaluation milestones, and continuity expectations before we convene Yemeni technical and civil society stakeholders.
• Kindly acknowledge the intended timeline for a formal response in line with ICANN’s Correspondence Process (target: 30 days).

For transparency, we intend to publish your reply and this follow-up. We can promptly provide technical exhibits and affidavits underpinning the security/stability concerns and a continuity runbook suitable for a neutral trusteeship.

Sincerely,

Lead Coordinator
For the FreeTheDotYE Campaign
freethedotye.org | @freethedotye
[email protected]

Submitted: September 23, 2025

From: Selina Harrington, IANA Operations Manager

To: FreeTheDotYE Campaign

Thread: Message 2 in conversation

Reply to: Request for Review and Redelegation of the .YE ccTLD due to Governance Failure and Lack of Community Representation

View Full Correspondence

Subject: [IANA #1429149] Request for Review and Redelegation of the .YE ccTLD due to Governance Failure and Lack of Community Representation

Dear requester,

Thank you for your request seeking to transfer the .YE country-code top-level domain (ccTLD) to an unspecified new manager.

IANA processes ccTLD delegation, transfer, and revocation requests in accordance with established policies and procedures, applying the same framework to all cases. The foundational principles are set out in RFC 1591, which describes the responsibilities of ccTLD managers as trustees serving the local Internet community. The ccNSO’s Framework of Interpretation provides further guidance on the application of RFC 1591. ICP-1, which you referenced, was rescinded more than a decade ago and is not applicable.

Revocation and transfer requests require careful evaluation against established criteria, and current policies do not allow for bypassing due process to effect a revocation or transfer of a ccTLD immediately, unilaterally, or on a temporary basis. Revocation is permitted only where a ccTLD manager has engaged in substantial misbehavior that threatens the stability or security of the DNS and continues after notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure. Such misbehavior is narrowly defined in policy, and matters of equity, justice, honesty, or general competency are expected to be resolved locally.

If a revocation were to occur, in order to retain continuity of operations of the domain, it would need to be associated with a delegation to a new ccTLD manager that demonstrates it meets the established criteria for managing a ccTLD. These include broad support from the local Internet community, administrative and technical competence, and the ability to serve the local Internet community in a fair and equitable manner. Should you wish to pursue this to a specific entity, we would require you to submit a complete application that addresses all relevant areas of assessment.

Our team is available at [email protected] to answer any questions you may have.

Kind regards,

– Selina Harrington IANA Operations Manager

Submitted: September 9, 2025

From: FreeTheDotYE Campaign

To: IANA Functions Operator (PTI) — [email protected]

Cc: ICANN GAC — [email protected]; ccNSO Secretariat — [email protected]

View Full Correspondence

Dear IANA Functions Operator,

We request that ICANN and IANA initiate a formal review of the delegation of Yemen’s country-code top-level domain (.YE) and proceed to redelegate it in accordance with RFC 1591 and ICP-1, because the current operator no longer serves the local Yemeni Internet community as a whole.

Basis in ICANN/IANA policy and practice

RFC 1591 establishes that a ccTLD manager “is a trustee for the delegated domain, and has a duty to serve the community” and must be equitable, just, honest, and competent for the entire local community [1].

ICP-1 (ICANN’s Internet Coordination Policy) outlines evaluation criteria for (re)delegations, including service to the local Internet community, operator competence/neutrality, and the overarching public interest [2].

IANA Root Zone Database lists TeleYemen as the .YE manager [3]. Since 2015, TeleYemen’s infrastructure has operated under Houthi militia control following the takeover of Sana’a, meaning .YE’s effective governance is under a non-state armed group, not community-representative institutions [4].

Demonstrable governance failures

Failure to serve the local Internet community (RFC 1591)

The .YE namespace excludes the internationally recognized government, independent institutions, and civil society, who are forced onto generic TLDs (.com, .net, .org). Meanwhile, militia-run portals occupy .gov.ye, .edu.ye, .net.ye, and .com.ye. This is not community-wide service; it is service to a single faction. [3][4][5]

Loss of neutrality and use of .YE for propaganda and information control

Under .YE, sites such as saba.ye and mmy.ye disseminate militia messaging while the same authority wields control over telecommunications to censor, surveil, and hack activists and NGOs—contrary to the neutrality and public-interest duties of a ccTLD trustee. [5][6][7][8]

Human-rights-linked risks that undermine trust and stability

Documented patterns include abduction, detention, and killing of independent journalists, as well as detentions of UN/NGO staff in areas under militia control. A ccTLD manager associated with such abuses cannot be considered a trusted or stable steward of a national namespace. This degrades trust in .YE locally and internationally and raises DNS-wide concerns. [9][10][11]

Requested action (within ICANN’s mandate under ICP-1)

  1. Initiate a formal IANA review of the current .YE delegation against RFC 1591/ICP-1 criteria (community service, neutrality, competence, public interest).
  2. Temporarily redelegate .YE to a neutral international trustee (e.g., an agreed independent operator under ICANN/IANA supervision) until a stable, legitimate, and representative national authority exists to assume stewardship.
  3. Affirm the core principle that a ccTLD must serve the entire local Internet community, not a single armed faction, and that the DNS must not normalize militia control of national identifiers.

We are prepared to supply additional documentation and to facilitate contact with Yemeni civil-society groups and technical stakeholders who can attest to the exclusionary and repressive operation of .YE under the current arrangement.

Sincerely,

FreeTheDotYE Campaign
[email protected]
https://freethedotye.org

References

  • [1] Postel, J. RFC 1591: Domain Name System Structure and Delegation (1994).
  • [2] ICANN. ICP-1: Internet Domain Name System Structure and Delegation (ccTLD Delegation and Redelegation).
  • [3] IANA Root Zone Database — .YE (Manager: TeleYemen).
  • [4] Wilson Center, “Who Are Yemen’s Houthis?” (overview of the 2014–2015 takeover and control of Sana’a).
  • [5] saba.ye (Houthi-run SABA “state” outlet); mmy.ye (Houthi military media portal).
  • [6] ARTICLE 19 & allied NGOs: Statements on Internet blocking and censorship in Yemen.
  • [7] Counter-Extremism/technical reporting on Telecom control enabling surveillance in Houthi-held areas.
  • [8] Civil-society/technical analyses linking TeleYemen control to censorship/monitoring.
  • [9] CPJ / RSF reports: kidnapping, detention, and killing of journalists in areas under Houthi control (incl. spikes reported in 2025).
  • [10] AP / HRW: Detention of UN and NGO staff by Houthis (multiple incidents 2024–2025).
  • [11] ICP-1 practice notes and past IANA cases (e.g., .SO redelegation) demonstrating action when a ccTLD fails to serve its local community.